Request pilot review

Test FieldHash on one workflow in six weeks.

In six weeks, without touching production, you will see what governance would have changed on one of your real workflows: which stale records, revoked tools, and expired precedents it would have kept out, and why.

FieldHash runs in shadow mode beside your current memory, RAG, or action path and compares the two across Governed Memory, Governed Actions, and Governed Precedent.

What you walk away with

Traces of what would have governed each answer, concrete examples of the stale records and revoked actions FieldHash kept out, latency findings, and an evidence report your legal, security, and governance teams can inspect.

Best for teams with a live or near-live workflow and a reviewer who can establish what should govern.

A strong first example is a policy or GRC assistant with one current policy source, one exception process, and a reviewer who owns what should govern.

Pilot structure

What's included in the 6-week pilot

One AI agent or workflow under stale-context or revoked-action pressure
Customer authority benchmark: current memory, RAG, or action baseline vs FieldHash shadow mode
Controlled enforcement simulation showing blocked records or actions excluded from the model packet
Before/after charts for stale, rejected, rolled-back, revoked, and out-of-scope influence
Approved-memory lineage and supersession trail
Answer-influence log with blocked-memory evidence
Governed Precedent testing showing which customer-approved review decisions remain eligible for bounded reuse and which return to review
One integration path: existing memory source plus approved model route
Final evidence report for legal, security, and governance review

Send the workflow. We will reply with fit, scope, and next steps.

The first reply is specific: whether the workflow is a fit, which approval, version, rollback, or revocation records matter, and what the SOW should measure.

Copyable first note

Workflow:
Example of the wrong handoff:
System or reviewer that determines what should govern:
Authority input available today (optional): prepared metadata, read-only SQL view, signed event feed, or another source path.
Agent or tool path available today (optional): Python call, internal service, MCP stdio or stateless HTTP server, structured computer-use packet, or another path.

Helpful detail

  • The workflow or agent, and what it does
  • One example of the wrong record, tool, action, or precedent reaching the handoff
  • Where current, approved, revoked, or superseded state lives today
  • Who reviews or approves that state
  • For policy or exception workflows, one approved, expired, or rejected example and the system that owns its status
  • Model route or deployment constraints, if known

You do not need a finished authority taxonomy or integration plan. Send the workflow anyway; the first scoping step maps the systems and reviewers that already define what should govern.

Need the package first? Review pilot scope. Need the architecture? See how FieldHash fits into your stack. Need the packet shape? View the evidence packet demo.

pilots@fieldhash.ai

Typical reply within 2 business days.

We use what you send to respond, scope the evaluation, and support requested deployment review. We do not sell personal data. See our Privacy Policy.